Non-targeted analysis of co-formulants in antifungal pesticide formulations by gas chromatography-tandem high resolution mass spectrometry.

In the present study, six commercial pesticide formulations with antifungal activity were characterized. Thus, two complementary injection methods based on gas chromatography were employed: direct injection (DI) and headspace (HS), both coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (GC-Q-Orbitrap-MS). The combination of both injection modes allowed the tentatively identification of potential co-formulants. Available analytical standards were acquired for their confirmation, and 21 compounds were successfully confirmed. Finally, the concentration of these co-formulants was calculated, finding the highest value in one of the pesticide formulation, at 218.22 g L ^-1 for cyclohexanone. Results clearly show that this methodology is suitable for the reliable identification of co-formulants in pesticide formulations, offering high sensitivity, and highlighting that five co-formulants were detected by both injection techniques (DI and HS). Moreover, one of the main advantages of the proposed methods was the great capacity for the elucidation of compounds with similar molecular formula, bearing in mind that up to 8 co-formulants with the same molecular formula C ₁₀ H ₁₄ , were well differentiated by retention times between 8.46 (1-methyl-3-propylbenzene) and 10.98 min (1,2,3,4- tetramethylbenzene) in one of the pesticide formulation. Toxicity to human health and the environment has been evidenced for the co-formulants detected, finding compounds with relatively high toxicity, as naphthalene and cyclohexanone.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)