Back to Search Start Over

Impact of fibre and red/processed meat intake on treatment outcomes among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases initiating biological therapy: A prospective cohort study.

Authors :
Overgaard SH
Sørensen SB
Munk HL
Nexøe AB
Glerup H
Henriksen RH
Guldmann T
Pedersen N
Saboori S
Hvid L
Dahlerup JF
Hvas CL
Jawhara M
Andersen KW
Pedersen AK
Nielsen OH
Bergenheim F
Brodersen JB
Heitmann BL
Halldorsson TI
Holmskov U
Bygum A
Christensen R
Kjeldsen J
Ellingsen T
Andersen V
Source :
Frontiers in nutrition [Front Nutr] 2022 Oct 13; Vol. 9, pp. 985732. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 13 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Biologic disease-modifying drugs have revolutionised the treatment of a number of chronic inflammatory diseases (CID). However, up to 60% of the patients do not have a sufficient response to treatment and there is a need for optimization of treatment strategies.<br />Objective: To investigate if the treatment outcome of biological therapy is associated with the habitual dietary intake of fibre and red/processed meat in patients with a CID.<br />Methods: In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we consecutively enrolled 233 adult patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Axial Spondyloarthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis, for whom biologic therapy was planned, over a 3 year period. Patients with completed baseline food frequency questionnaires were stratified into a high fibre/low red and processed meat exposed group (HFLM) and an unexposed group (low fibre/high red and processed meat intake = LFHM). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a clinical response to biologic therapy after 14-16 weeks of treatment.<br />Results: Of the 193 patients included in our primary analysis, 114 (59%) had a clinical response to biologic therapy. In the HFLM group ( N = 64), 41 (64%) patients responded to treatment compared to 73 (56%) in the LFHM group ( N = 129), but the difference was not statistically significant (OR: 1.48, 0.72-3.05). For RA patients however, HFLM diet was associated with a more likely clinical response (82% vs. 35%; OR: 9.84, 1.35-71.56).<br />Conclusion: Habitual HFLM intake did not affect the clinical response to biological treatment across CIDs. HFLM diet in RA patients might be associated with better odds for responding to biological treatment, but this would need confirmation in a randomised trial.<br />Trial Registration: (clinicaltrials.gov), identifier [NCT03173144].<br />Competing Interests: Author CH has received speaker fee from Takeda Pharma and Tillotts Pharma (unrelated to the present work). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Overgaard, Sørensen, Munk, Nexøe, Glerup, Henriksen, Guldmann, Pedersen, Saboori, Hvid, Dahlerup, Hvas, Jawhara, Andersen, Pedersen, Nielsen, Bergenheim, Brodersen, Heitmann, Halldorsson, Holmskov, Bygum, Christensen, Kjeldsen, Ellingsen and Andersen.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2296-861X
Volume :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in nutrition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36313095
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.985732