The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System.

Purpose To evaluate the imaging performance of an on-board helical kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) system mounted on a helical tomotherapy unit for various imaging parameters and setup conditions. Methods Images of a commonly used computed tomography (CT) image quality phantom were acquired while varying the selection of available parameters (anatomy, mode, body size) as well as phantom positioning and size. Image quality metrics (IQM) including noise, uniformity, contrast, CT number constancy, and spatial resolution were compared for parameter and setup variations.  Results The use of fine mode improved noise and contrast metrics by 20-30% compared to normal mode and by nearly a factor of two compared to the coarse mode for otherwise identical protocols. Uniformity, CT number constancy, and spatial resolution were also improved for fine mode. Thorax and pelvis anatomy protocols improved noise, uniformity, and contrast metrics by 10-20% compared to images acquired with head protocols. No significant differences in CT number constancy or spatial resolution were observed regardless of anatomy choice. Increasing body size (milliampere second (mAs)/rotation) improved each image quality metric. Vertical and lateral phantom shifts of up to ±6 cm degraded noise and contrast metrics by up to 30% relative to the isocenter while also worsening uniformity and CT number constancy. IQM were also degraded substantially with the use of annuli to increase the phantom diameter (32 cm vs. 20 cm). Despite variations in image characteristics among the investigated changes, most metrics were within manufacturer specifications when applicable. Conclusion This work demonstrates the dependence of image quality on parameter selection and setup conditions for a helical kVCT system utilized in image-guided and adaptive helical tomotherapy treatments. While the overall image quality is robust to variations in imaging parameters, care should be taken when selecting parameters as patient size increases or positioning moves from the isocenter to ensure adequate image quality is still achieved.
Competing Interests: While this project received no external funding, data were collected on a Radixact system (Accuracy, Inc.) provided to UW-Madison under a research agreement (Bayouth, PI). Under this agreement, Accuracy, Inc. was provided the opportunity to review this article prior to submission to ensure that no trade secrets were divulged.
(Copyright © 2022, Tegtmeier et al.)