Systematic pattern analyses of Vδ2 + TCRs reveal that shared "public" Vδ2 + γδ T cell clones are a consequence of rearrangement bias and a higher expansion status.

Background: Vγ9Vδ2 ⁺ T cells are a major innate T cell subset in human peripheral blood. Their Vδ2 ⁺ VDJ-rearrangements are short and simple in the fetal thymus and gradually increase in diversity and CDR3 length along with development. So-called "public" versions of Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs are shared among individuals of all ages. However, it is unclear whether such frequently occurring "public" Vγ9Vδ2 ⁺ T cell clones are derived from the fetal thymus and whether they are fitter to proliferate and persist than infrequent "private" clones.
Methods: Shared "public" Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs were identified from Vδ2 ⁺ TCR-repertoires collected from 89 individuals, including newborns (cord blood), infants, and adults (peripheral blood). Distance matrices of Vδ2 ⁺ CDR3 were generated by TCRdist3 and then embedded into a UMAP for visualizing the heterogeneity of Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs.
Results: Vδ2 ⁺ CDR3 distance matrix embedded by UMAP revealed that the heterogeneity of Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs is primarily determined by the J-usage and CDR3aa length, while age or publicity-specific motifs were not found. The most prevalent public Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs showed germline-like rearrangement with low N-insertions. Age-related features were also identified. Public Vδ2 ⁺ TRDJ1 TCRs from cord blood showed higher N-insertions and longer CDR3 lengths. Synonymous codons resulting from VDJ rearrangement also contribute to the generation of public Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs. Each public TCR was always produced by multiple different transcripts, even with different D gene usage, and the publicity of Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs was positively associated with expansion status.
Conclusion: To conclude, the heterogeneity of Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs is mainly determined by TRDJ -usage and the length of CDR3aa sequences. Public Vδ2 ⁺ TCRs result from germline-like rearrangement and synonymous codons, associated with a higher expansion status.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 Deng, Harms, Ravens, Prinz and Tan.)