Fracture strength of flared root canals reinforced using different post and core materials.

Purpose: To examine the fracture strength and fracture mode of flared root canals reinforced with different post and core materials.
Materials and Methods: Forty endodontically treated bovine teeth structured to mimic human mandibular premolars with flared root canals were reinforced with resin composite and glass fiber post (FRC), composite resin (RC), ceramic core (LD), and ceramic core with resin composite reinforcement (RLD), and restored with single zirconia crowns (n = 10 in each group). The fracture strength and mode of the root canals restored with zirconia crown were assessed. The fracture strength was compared with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) following Tukey HSD tests. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to test the effect of the post/core materials on the fracture loads. Fisher's exact test was used in the failure mode analysis.
Results: The mean fracture strength of RLD was significantly higher than RC, FRC, and LD (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were found among RC, FRC, and LD (p < 0.05). The regression analysis found that the fracture strength using the lithium disilicate was significantly lower for the post and higher for the core than that using the resin composite (p < 0.05), and there were no significant difference in the fracture strengths between the resin composite and glass fiber used for the post (p > 0.05). Most of the specimens exhibited root fractures, and no significant differences were observed among the groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that reinforcement of flared root canals using a combination of resin composite for the core and lithium disilicate ceramic for the post is superior to resin composite and glass fiber in mechanical properties when restoring a single crown.
(© 2022 by the American College of Prosthodontists.)