Safety, Efficacy, and Predictors for Late Reintervention After Embolization of Renal Angiomyolipomas - Embolization renal angiomyolipoma.

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze the procedural and long-term clinical outcome of the selective embolization of renal angiomyolipoma. In addition, potential predictive factors for higher risk of late re-intervention were analyzed.
Methods: Retrospective monocentric study, including 34 consecutive patients, analyzing the safety, efficiency, and long-term clinical outcome of catheter-directed embolization of renal AML. Additionally, the difference in postembolization renal function between patients embolized in the acute and in the elective setting was analyzed. Secondly, we also evaluated whether volume/diameter of the AML and presence of intralesional aneurysms are risk factors for late re-intervention.
Results: Embolization of renal AML was performed to control volume (n = 21; 62 %) or to stop spontaneous hemorrhage (n = 13; 38 %) with angiographic success in all cases but was associated with renal abscess (n = 1) and pulmonary embolism (n = 1) without a significant difference in renal function before and after embolization (P = 0.513). Volume/diameter (P = 0.276/P = 0.21) and presence of aneurysms before embolization (P = 0.37) are not predictive for a higher risk of late re-intervention.
Conclusion: Catheter-directed embolization is a safe and effective treatment modality for asymptomatic and bleeding renal AML, without a negative impact on renal function. Initial mass volume/diameter or presence/absence of intralesional aneurysms does not seem to be predictive for late re-intervention.
Key Points: · Complications related to renal angiomyolipoma embolization are rare.. · Embolization of angiomyolipoma will not reduce renal function.. · Initial volume or diameter of angiomyolipoma is not predictive for late re-intervention..
Citation Format: · Claesen E, Bonne L, Laenen A et al. Safety, Efficacy, and Predictors for Late Reintervention After Embolization of Renal Angiomyolipomas. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 319 - 325.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
(Thieme. All rights reserved.)