Back to Search Start Over

Non-invasive ventilation for preoxygenation before general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors :
Chiang TL
Tam KW
Chen JT
Wong CS
Yeh CT
Huang TY
Ong JR
Source :
BMC anesthesiology [BMC Anesthesiol] 2022 Sep 30; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 306. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 30.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Preoxygenation is crucial for providing sufficient oxygen reservoir to a patient before intubation and enables the extension of the period between breathing termination and critical desaturation (safe apnoea time). Conventionally, face mask ventilation is used for preoxygenation. Non-invasive ventilation is a new preoxygenation method. The study objective was to compare the outcomes of non-invasive ventilation and face mask ventilation for preoxygenation.<br />Method: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for eligible studies published from database inception to September 2021. Individual effect sizes were standardized, and a meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models to calculate the pooled effect size. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of comparing the outcomes of non-invasive ventilation or face mask ventilation for preoxygenation in patients scheduled for surgeries. The primary outcome was safe apnea time, and the secondary outcomes were post-operative complications, number of patients who achieved the expired O <subscript>2</subscript> fraction (FeO <subscript>2</subscript> ) after 3 min of preoxygenation, minimal SpO <subscript>2</subscript> during tracheal intubation, partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO <subscript>2</subscript> ) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO <subscript>2</subscript> ) after preoxygenation, and PaO <subscript>2</subscript> and PaCO <subscript>2</subscript> after tracheal intubation.<br />Results: 13 trials were eligible for inclusion in this study. Significant differences were observed in safe apnoea time, number of patients who achieved FeO <subscript>2</subscript> 90% after preoxygenation for 3 min, and PaO <subscript>2</subscript> and PaCO <subscript>2</subscript> after preoxygenation and tracheal intubation. Only in the non-obese subgroup, no significant difference was observed in safe apnoea time (mean difference: 125.38, 95% confidence interval: - 12.26 to 263.03).<br />Conclusion: Non-invasive ventilation appeared to be more effective than conventional methods for preoxygenation. We recommend non-invasive ventilation based on our results.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2253
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC anesthesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36180822
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01842-y