Back to Search Start Over

Frequency of New or Enlarging Lesions on MRI Outside of Clinical Attacks in Patients With MOG-Antibody-Associated Disease.

Authors :
Syc-Mazurek SB
Chen JJ
Morris P
Sechi E
Mandrekar J
Tillema JM
Lopez-Chiriboga AS
Lucchinetti CF
Zalewski N
Cacciaguerra L
Buciuc M
Krecke KN
Messina SA
Bhatti MT
Pittock SJ
Flanagan EP
Source :
Neurology [Neurology] 2022 Oct 31; Vol. 99 (18), pp. 795-799. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 31.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and Objective: To determine the frequency of new or enlarging T2-hyperintense or enhancing lesions outside of clinical attacks in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) vs multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 antibody positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD).<br />Methods: We retrospectively included Mayo Clinic patients with MOGAD with: (1) MOG-Immunoglobulin-G positivity by live cell-based assay, (2) fulfilling proposed MOGAD diagnostic criteria, and (3) baseline and follow-up paired MRIs without interval attacks. A neurologist and neuroradiologist reviewed MRIs (T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery brain, T2 spine, and T1-postgadolinium brain and spine) to identify new or enlarging lesions. A MOGAD subset was then compared to patients with MS and AQP4+NMOSD, based on broadly similar interscan intervals.<br />Results: We included 105 patients with MOGAD (median age, 31 years [range, 2-80]; 60% female) with 373 paired MRIs. In total, 10/105 (9.5%) patients and 13/373 (3%) scans had one or more new T2 lesions (brain, 12/213 [6%]; spine, 1/160 [0.6%]); and 8/367 (2%) had enhancing lesions. New brain lesions were less in MOGAD (1/25 [4%]) than MS (14/26 [54%], p < 0.0001) but did not differ from AQP4+NMOSD (1/13 [8%], p = 1.0) in subgroup analysis. New spinal lesions were rare across groups (0%-4%).<br />Discussion: New or enlarging MRI lesions rarely develop outside of clinical attacks in MOGAD differing from MS. Surveillance MRIs in MOGAD have limited utility with implications for clinical practice and trial design.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1526-632X
Volume :
99
Issue :
18
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36175150
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201263