Back to Search Start Over

Soft Cervical Orthosis Use Does Not Improve Fusion Rates After One-Level and Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors :
Lambrechts MJ
Issa TZ
Toci GR
D'Antonio ND
Karamian BA
Tecce E
Fras S
Kaye ID
Woods BI
Kepler CK
Vaccaro AR
Schroeder GD
Hilibrand AS
Canseco JA
Source :
World neurosurgery [World Neurosurg] 2022 Nov; Vol. 167, pp. e1461-e1467. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 26.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: To determine if postoperative soft cervical orthosis use affects arthrodesis rates on a per-level or construct basis after 1-level and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).<br />Methods: Electronic medical records were queried for 1-level and 2-level primary ACDF between 2016 and 2019 at a single academic center. Surgeons prescribed either a soft cervical orthosis or no orthosis. Pseudarthrosis rates were evaluated by dynamic cervical spine radiographs with arthrodesis defined by <1 mm of interspinous motion. Continuous and categorical data were compared using analysis of variance or χ <superscript>2</superscript> tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine independent predictors of pseudarthrosis.<br />Results: A total of 316 unique patients (504 instrumented levels) met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-four percent of patients were prescribed a soft cervical orthosis. Overall, arthrodesis occurred at 344 (80.9%) and 62 (78%) levels in patients with and without cervical orthosis, respectively. When evaluating patients placed in a cervical orthosis versus those who were not, there were no differences in pseudarthrosis or revision rates. Further, there were no differences in pseudarthrosis on a per-level basis. Further, cervical orthosis use was not an independent predictor of pseudarthrosis (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.57; P =0.623) on multivariate analysis.<br />Conclusions: Postoperative placement of soft cervical orthoses after 1-level or 2-level ACDF was not associated with improved arthrodesis or reduced rate of revision surgery.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-8769
Volume :
167
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
World neurosurgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36174948
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.095