The Impact of Upper Instrumented Vertebra Orientation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Novel and Fixed Parameter, Fused Spinopelvic Angle.

Study Design: A retrospective study.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) orientation including the fused spinopelvic angle (FSPA) on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).
Summary of Background Data: PJK is a challenging complication after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Some studies proposed UIV orientation act as a risk factor of PJK, but there remain debates because UIV orientation is changed by position. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the FSPA, a novel parameter for the relationship between UIV and pelvis which did not change by position, and PJK.
Materials and Methods: ASD patients who underwent long-segment fusion to the pelvis and followed up for more than two years were included. Comparative analysis was performed on spinopelvic parameters including UIV orientation parameters (UIV slope angle and FSPA) between PJK and non-PJK group. Binary regression analysis was conducted to find out the risk factors for PJK. And correlation analysis was conducted to find out the parameters that affect the FSPA.
Results: A total of 190 patients were included. PJK incidence was 13.2% (25/190). PJK group showed a significantly greater postoperative UIV slope (21.3° vs. 18.8°, P =0.041) and significantly lesser postoperative FSPA (-0.9° vs. 4.5°, P <0.001). In binary regression analysis, only FSPA acted as a risk factor of PJK (odds ratio=0.920, P =0.004). The FSPA has strong positive correlation with pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) ( r =0.666, P <0.001) and negative correlation with lordosis distribution index (LDI) ( r =-0.228, P =0.004).
Conclusion: The FSPA is a fixed parameter which is not dependent on position. A reduction of the FSPA increases the risk for PJK. The FSPA can be adjusted through PI-LL and LDI. Thus, surgeons should increase the FSPA by adjusting the PI-LL and LDI during ASD surgery to prevent PJK.
Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)