Back to Search Start Over

Gaps after linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Clinical implication.

Authors :
Takagi T
Derval N
Duchateau J
Chauvel R
Tixier R
Marchand H
Bouyer B
André C
Kamakura T
Krisai P
Ascione C
Balbo C
Cheniti G
Denis A
Sacher F
Hocini M
Jaïs P
Haïssaguerre M
Pambrun T
Source :
Heart rhythm [Heart Rhythm] 2023 Jan; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 14-21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 14.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Beyond pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, anatomic isthmus transection is an adjunctive strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Data on the durability of multiple lines of block remain scarce.<br />Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gaps within such a lesion set.<br />Methods: We followed 291 consecutive patients who underwent (1) vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, (2) PV isolation, and (3) mitral, cavotricuspid, and dome isthmus transection. Dome transection relied on 2 distinct strategies over time: a single roof line with touch-ups applied in case of gap demonstrated by conventional maneuvers (first leg), and an alternative floor line if the roof line exhibited a gap during high-density mapping with careful electrogram reannotation (second leg).<br />Results: Twelve-month sinus rhythm maintenance was 70% after 1 procedure and 94% after 1 or 2 procedures. Event-free survival after the first procedure was lower in case of residual gaps within the lesion set (log-rank, P = .004). Delayed gaps were found in 94% of a second procedure performed in the 69 patients relapsing despite a complete lesion set with PV gaps increasing the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (67% vs 34%; P = .02) and anatomic isthmus gaps supporting a majority of atrial tachycardias (60%). Between the first leg and the second leg, a significant decrease was found in roof lines considered blocked during the first procedure (99% vs 78%; P < .001) and in delayed dome gaps observed during a second procedure (68% vs 43%; P = .05).<br />Conclusion: Gaps are arrhythmogenic and can be reduced by optimized ablation and assessment of lines of block. Closing these gaps improves sinus rhythm maintenance.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1556-3871
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heart rhythm
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36115541
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.09.009