Vertical distributions of atmospheric black carbon in dry and wet seasons observed at a 356-m meteorological tower in Shenzhen, South China.

Black carbon (BC) is a vital climate forcer in the atmosphere, but measurements of BC vertical profiles near the surface remain limited. This study investigates time-resolved vertical profiling of BC in both dry (December 2017) and wet (August 2018) seasons in Shenzhen, China, at a 356-m meteorological tower. In the dry season, five micro-aethalometers were deployed at different heights (2, 50, 100, 200, and 350 m), while four heights (2, 100, 200, and 350 m) were measured in the wet season. The concentrations of equivalent BC (eBC) showed a decreasing trend with altitude in the dry season, while a weaker vertical gradient was observed in the wet season. The diurnal variability of eBC in the dry season is also more significant than in the wet season. Correlation analysis between eBC concentrations at the ground and those at the upper levels suggest a better vertical mixing of eBC in the wet season than in the dry season. In the wet season when south wind prevailed, eBC concentration at ground level was likely reduced by the large amount of vegetation cover south to the sampling site. In the dry season, eBC concentrations at 350 m show little dependence on wind speed, implying that local emissions have a limited effect on eBC concentrations at 350 m. In the wet season when brown carbon influence was weak, higher wind speed leads to a higher Ångström exponent (AAE) at 350 m, likely associated with more aged BC particles. Cluster analysis of backward trajectories suggests that high eBC concentration was associated with air masses from Central China in both seasons. This study provides a better understanding on the influencing factors that affect the vertical distributions of BC in the lower part of the boundary layer.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)