Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Clinical Outcomes in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors :
Hecht S
Butcher SC
Pio SM
Kong WKF
Singh GK
Ng ACT
Perry R
Poh KK
Almeida AG
González A
Shen M
Yeo TC
Shanks M
Popescu BA
Gay LG
Fijałkowski M
Liang M
Tay E
Marsan NA
Selvanayagam J
Pinto F
Zamorano JL
Evangelista A
Delgado V
Bax JJ
Pibarot P
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] 2022 Sep 13; Vol. 80 (11), pp. 1071-1084.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease has not been previously studied.<br />Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of LVEF in BAV patients according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data collected in 2,672 patients included in an international registry of patients with BAV. Patients were classified according to the type of aortic valve dysfunction: isolated aortic stenosis (AS) (n = 749), isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) (n = 554), mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) (n = 190), or no significant aortic valve dysfunction (n = 1,179; excluded from this analysis). The study population was divided according to LVEF strata to investigate its impact on clinical outcomes.<br />Results: The risk of all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of aortic valve replacement or repair (AVR) and all-cause mortality increased when LVEF was <60% in the whole cohort as well as in the AS and AR groups, and when LVEF was <55% in MAVD group. In multivariable analysis, LVEF strata were significantly associated with increased rate of mortality (LVEF 50%-59%: HR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.09-3.07]; P = 0.022; LVEF 30%-49%: HR: 1.97 [95% CI: 1.13-3.41]; P = 0.016; LVEF <30%: HR: 4.20 [95% CI: 2.01-8.75]; P < 0.001; vs LVEF 60%-70%, reference group).<br />Conclusions: In BAV patients, the risk of adverse clinical outcomes increases significantly when the LVEF is <60%. These findings suggest that LVEF cutoff values proposed in the guidelines to indicate intervention should be raised from 50% to 60% in AS or AR and 55% in MAVD.<br />Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Department of Cardiology of the Leiden University Medical Center has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Bioventrix, Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Butcher has received funding from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC Research Grant App000080404). Drs Marsan and Bax have received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Delgado has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and GE Healthcare. Dr Pibarot holds the Canada Research Chair in Valvular Heart Diseases, Canadian Institutes of Health Research; and has received funding from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic for echocardiography CoreLab analyses with no personal compensation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1558-3597
Volume :
80
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36075677
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.032