Back to Search Start Over

Administration of vitamin D and its metabolites in critically ill adult patients: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors :
Menger J
Lee ZY
Notz Q
Wallqvist J
Hasan MS
Elke G
Dworschak M
Meybohm P
Heyland DK
Stoppe C
Source :
Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2022 Sep 06; Vol. 26 (1), pp. 268. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 06.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The clinical significance of vitamin D administration in critically ill patients remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of vitamin D and its metabolites on major clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, including a subgroup analysis based on vitamin D status and route of vitamin D administration.<br />Methods: Major databases were searched through February 9, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of adult critically ill patients with an intervention group receiving vitamin D or its metabolites were included. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio (dichotomized outcomes) or mean difference (continuous outcomes). Risk of bias assessment included the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.<br />Results: Sixteen randomized clinical trials with 2449 patients were included. Vitamin D administration was associated with lower overall mortality (16 studies: risk ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.97, p = 0.03; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 30%), reduced intensive care unit length of stay (12 studies: mean difference - 3.13 days, 95% CI - 5.36 to - 0.89, n = 1250, p = 0.006; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 70%), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (9 studies: mean difference - 5.07 days, 95% CI - 7.42 to - 2.73, n = 572, p < 0.0001; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 54%). Parenteral administration was associated with a greater effect on overall mortality than enteral administration (test of subgroup differences, p = 0.04), whereas studies of parenteral subgroups had lower quality. There were no subgroup differences based on baseline vitamin D levels.<br />Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients may reduce mortality. Parenteral administration might be associated with a greater impact on mortality. Heterogeneity and assessed certainty among the studies limits the generalizability of the results.<br />Trial Registration: PROSPERO international prospective database of systematic reviews (CRD42021256939-05 July 2021).<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1466-609X
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36068584
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04139-1