Factors Associated With Mechanical Ventilation Duration in Pediatric Burn Patients in a Regional Burn Center in the United States.

Objectives: Among burned children who arrive at a burn center and require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), some may have prolonged IMV needs. This has implications for patient-centered outcomes as well as triage and resource allocation decisions. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the duration of mechanical ventilation in pediatric patients with acute burn injury in this setting.
Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Registry data from a regional, pediatric burn center in the United States.
Patients: Children less than or equal to 18 years old admitted with acute burn injury who received IMV between January 2005 and December 2020.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and Main Results: Ventilator days were defined as any full or partial day having received IMV via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy, not inclusive of time spent ventilated for procedures. Of 5,766 admissions for acute burn care, 4.3% ( n = 249) required IMV with a median duration of 10 days. A multivariable model for freedom from mechanical ventilation showed that the presence of inhalational injury (subhazard ratio [sHR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.85) and burns to the head and neck region (sHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98) were associated with increased risk of remaining mechanically ventilated at any time point. Older (sHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and male children (sHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84) were more likely to discontinue mechanical ventilation. A majority of children (94.8%) survived to hospital discharge.
Conclusions: The presence of inhalational injury and burns to the head and neck region were associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. Older age and male gender were associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. These factors should help clinicians better estimate a burned child's expected trajectory and resource-intensive needs upon arrival to a burn center.
Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)