Duration of resuscitation and long-term outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide observational study.

Background: Prior studies have investigated the association between duration of resuscitation and short-term outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). However, it remains unknown whether there is an association between duration of resuscitation and long-term survival and functional outcomes.
Method: We linked data from the Danish in-hospital cardiac arrest registry with nationwide registries and identified 8,727 patients between 2013 and 2019. Patients were stratified into four groups (A-D) according to quartiles of duration of resuscitation. Standardized average probability of outcomes was estimated using logistic regression.
Results: Of 8,727 patients, 53.1% (n = 4,604) achieved return of spontaneous circulation. Median age was 74 (1st-3rd quartile [Q1-Q3] 65-81 years) and 63.1% were men. Among all IHCA patients the standardized 30-day survival was 62.0% (95% CI 59.8-64.2%) for group A (<5 minutes), 32.7% (30.8-34.6%) for group B (5-11 minutes), 14.4% (12.9-15.9%) for group C (12-20 minutes) and 8.1% (7.0-9.1%) for group D (21 minutes or more). Similarly, 1-year survival was also highest for group A (50.4%; 48.2-52.6%) gradually decreasing to 6.6% (5.6-7.6%) in group D. Among 30-day survivors, survival without anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission within one-year post-arrest was highest for group A (80.4%; 78.2-82.6%), decreasing to 73.3% (70.0-76.6%) in group B, 67.2% (61.7-72.6%) in group C and 73.3% (66.9-79.7%) in group D.
Conclusion: Shorter duration of resuscitation attempt during an IHCA is associated with higher 30-day and 1-year survival. Furthermore, we found that the majority of 30-day survivors were still alive 1-year post-arrest without anoxic brain damage or nursing home admission despite prolonged resuscitation.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘Dr. Kragholm reports having received research grants from the Laerdal foundation. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.’.
(Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)