Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes of Sorafenib for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation in the Era of Combined and Sequential Treatments.

Authors :
Tovoli F
Pallotta DP
Sansone V
Iavarone M
De Giorgio M
Ielasi L
Di Costanzo GG
Giuffrida P
Sacco R
Pressiani T
Di Donato MF
Trevisani F
Fagiuoli S
Piscaglia F
Granito A
Source :
Transplantation [Transplantation] 2023 Jan 01; Vol. 107 (1), pp. 156-161. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 02.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Sorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the current standard of care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurring after liver transplantation (LT). Sorafenib is sometimes regarded as a scarcely effective treatment in this setting because of some studies showing a short overall survival (OS) indirectly compared with historical series of nontransplanted patients. Additional data from multicenter prospective studies are needed before drawing definite conclusions.<br />Methods: Retrospective analyses of a large prospective multicenter dataset of sorafenib-treated HCC patients to report the characteristics and outcomes of LT recipients (n = 81).<br />Results: At the baseline, LT patients had key prognostic features (high prevalence of metastatic disease, and low prevalence of macrovascular invasion, α-fetoprotein >400 ng/mL, ALBI grade >1, performance status >0) that differentiated them from the typical populations of non-LT patient reported in clinical trials and observational studies. Moreover, a relevant proportion of LT patients received concurrent locoregional (12.3%) and postprogression systemic treatments (34.2%), resulting in a median OS of 18.7 mo.<br />Conclusions: Multimodal and sequential treatments are relatively frequent in post-LT HCC patients and contribute to a remarkable OS, together with favorable baseline characteristics. Despite the impossibility of matching with non-LT patients, our results indirectly suggest that the metastatic nature of post-LT recurrence and concurrent antirejection regimens should not discourage systemic treatments.<br />Competing Interests: F.T. has served as a consultant for Bayer, Ipsen, and Eisai and an advisory board member for Laforce. M.I.: speaking/teaching, consultant, and the advisory board for Bayer, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, BTG-Boston Scientific, AbbVie, Guerbet, and EISAI. M.D.G. received honoraria for serving on advisory boards for Eisai and Bayer. F.T. is an advisor and a consultant for Bayer and an advisory board member for Sirtex, Alfasigma, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. F.P. is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, EISAI, GE, and Tiziana Life Sciences; Speaker bureau honoraria: Bayer AG, Bracco, EISAI, and Laforce; research contract with Esaote. A.G. has served as a consultant for Bayer. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1534-6080
Volume :
107
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35996072
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004271