Back to Search Start Over

Quality assurance for automatically generated contours with additional deep learning.

Authors :
Isaksson LJ
Summers P
Bhalerao A
Gandini S
Raimondi S
Pepa M
Zaffaroni M
Corrao G
Mazzola GC
Rotondi M
Lo Presti G
Haron Z
Alessi S
Pricolo P
Mistretta FA
Luzzago S
Cattani F
Musi G
De Cobelli O
Cremonesi M
Orecchia R
Marvaso G
Petralia G
Jereczek-Fossa BA
Source :
Insights into imaging [Insights Imaging] 2022 Aug 17; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 137. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 17.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: Deploying an automatic segmentation model in practice should require rigorous quality assurance (QA) and continuous monitoring of the model's use and performance, particularly in high-stakes scenarios such as healthcare. Currently, however, tools to assist with QA for such models are not available to AI researchers. In this work, we build a deep learning model that estimates the quality of automatically generated contours.<br />Methods: The model was trained to predict the segmentation quality by outputting an estimate of the Dice similarity coefficient given an image contour pair as input. Our dataset contained 60 axial T2-weighted MRI images of prostates with ground truth segmentations along with 80 automatically generated segmentation masks. The model we used was a 3D version of the EfficientDet architecture with a custom regression head. For validation, we used a fivefold cross-validation. To counteract the limitation of the small dataset, we used an extensive data augmentation scheme capable of producing virtually infinite training samples from a single ground truth label mask. In addition, we compared the results against a baseline model that only uses clinical variables for its predictions.<br />Results: Our model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.020 ± 0.026 (2.2% mean percentage error) in estimating the Dice score, with a rank correlation of 0.42. Furthermore, the model managed to correctly identify incorrect segmentations (defined in terms of acceptable/unacceptable) 99.6% of the time.<br />Conclusion: We believe that the trained model can be used alongside automatic segmentation tools to ensure quality and thus allow intervention to prevent undesired segmentation behavior.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1869-4101
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Insights into imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35976491
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01276-7