Back to Search Start Over

Team Situation Awareness, Cohesion, and Autonomic Synchrony.

Authors :
Guastello SJ
Bednarczyk C
Hagan R
Johnson C
Marscisek L
McGuigan L
Peressini AF
Source :
Human factors [Hum Factors] 2024 Apr; Vol. 66 (4), pp. 1186-1200. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 16.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the causal relationships among situation awareness (SA), cohesion, and autonomic synchrony ( S <subscript> E </subscript> ) within teams. SA is often a team effort and should be more accurate in better-functioning teams.<br />Background: Cohesive teams perform better overall, although the relationship appears reciprocal; the relationship to SA has not been considered previously. S <subscript> E </subscript> is a collective neurocognitive activity that has been connected to team coordination, communication, and performance in some circumstances.<br />Method: In this experiment, 71 undergraduates, organized into 16 teams, played two matches of a first-person shooter computer game and completed self-report measures of cohesion and SA. S <subscript> E </subscript> was determined through time series analysis of electrodermal responses using the driver-empath framework.<br />Results: Empaths and those who came from more synchronized teams reported less cohesion in the team. Granger causality regression showed reciprocal relations among SA, S <subscript> E </subscript> , and cohesion that were both positive and negative after controlling for match difficulty.<br />Conclusion: The cohesion-SA relationship is similar to the reciprocal cohesion-performance relationship. S <subscript> E </subscript> plays an important and independent role in both the social and cognitive aspects of team behavior. It is possible, furthermore, that individuals who are more attuned to their co-workers reported a more accurate, and less obliging, social situation.<br />Application: Results are applicable to situations requiring teamwork in a dynamic environment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1547-8181
Volume :
66
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Human factors
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35973125
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221118301