Effect of Aerosol Inhalation Combined With a Vibration Expectoration Machine on Sputum Volume, IGF-1, α1-AT and PDGF-B in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Emphysema.

Objective: Aerosol inhalation is commonly used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema (COPE). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of aerosol inhalation combined with a vibration expectoration machine on COPE.
Methods: From June 2019 to June 2020, 110 patients receiving COPE treatment in Linyi Central Hospital in China were included in this randomized controlled trial. All patients were randomly assigned into one of two groups using the random number table. A total of 55 patients were given aerosol inhalation combined with the use of a vibration expectoration machine in the study group, and 55 patients were given aerosol inhalation alone in the control group. The general data, clinical efficacy arterial blood gas index, pulmonary function index and serum levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), alpha 1 antitrypsin (α1-AT) and platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) were compared.
Results: There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups (P > .05). After treatment, the clinical efficacy in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group (96.36% vs 81.82%, respectively; P = .023), daily sputum production in the study group was significantly higher compared with the control group (80.92 ± 10.29 vs 58.63 ± 9.02 ml, respectively; P < .001) and hospitalization time was significantly reduced in the study group (11.87 ± 1.76 vs 17.62 ± 1.92 days, respectively; P < .001). In addition, the respiratory rate was significantly lower in the study group (17.43 ± 1.61 vs 22.08 ± 3.25, respectively; P < .001). Partial pressure of oxygen (P[O2]) was significantly higher (76.29 ± 7.34 vs 66.81 ± 7.93 mmHg, respectively; P < .001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P[CO2]) was significantly lower (34.82 ± 6.02 vs 39.83 ± 6.01 mmHg respectively; P < .001) in the study group compared with the control group. In addition, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (1.79 ± 0.36 vs 1.66 ± 0.28 L, respectively), forced vital capacity (FVC) (2.58 ± 0.28 vs 2.42 ± 0.11 L, respectively), forced expiratory volume in the first second as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1%pred) (65.32 ± 4.03 vs 59.83 ± 4.76 L, respectively) and maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) (1.51 ± 0.27% vs 1.36 ± 0.12%, respectively) were all significantly increased after treatment in the study group compared with the control group (all P < .001). The IGF-1 (104.92 ± 11.27 vs 137.83 ± 11.02 ng/mL, respectively) and PDGF-B (124.39 ± 14.29 vs 249.93 ± 33.49 ng/L, respectively) were significantly reduced in the study group after treatment (all P < .001). The α1-AT (2.82 ± 0.38 vs 2.17 ± 0.22 g/L, respectively) were significantly increased after treatment in the study group compared with the control group.
Conclusion: Aerosol inhalation combined with the use of a vibration expectoration machine is worthy of clinical application, and can effectively improve outcomes in patients with COPE.