Back to Search
Start Over
Promoting Informed Decisions About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults (PRIMED Study): a Physician Cluster Randomized Trial.
- Source :
-
Journal of general internal medicine [J Gen Intern Med] 2023 Feb; Vol. 38 (2), pp. 406-413. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 05. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Background: For adults aged 76-85, guidelines recommend individualizing decision-making about whether to continue colorectal cancer (CRC) testing. These conversations can be challenging as they need to consider a patient's CRC risk, life expectancy, and preferences.<br />Objective: To promote shared decision-making (SDM) for CRC testing decisions for older adults.<br />Design: Two-arm, multi-site cluster randomized trial, assigning physicians to Intervention and Comparator arms. Patients were surveyed shortly after the visit to assess outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat.<br />Participants and Setting: Primary care physicians affiliated with 5 academic and community hospital networks and their patients aged 76-85 who were due for CRC testing and had a visit during the study period.<br />Interventions: Intervention arm physicians completed a 2-h online course in SDM communication skills and received an electronic reminder of patients eligible for CRC testing shortly before the visit. Comparator arm received reminders only.<br />Main Measures: The primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process score (range 0-4 with higher scores indicating more SDM); secondary outcomes included patient-reported discussion of CRC screening, knowledge, intention, and satisfaction with the visit.<br />Key Results: Sixty-seven physicians (Intervention n=34 and Comparator n=33) enrolled. Patient participants (n=466) were on average 79 years old, 50% with excellent or very good self-rated overall health, and 66% had one or more prior colonoscopies. Patients in the Intervention arm had higher SDM Process scores (adjusted mean difference 0.36 (95%CI (0.08, 0.64), p=0.01) than in the Comparator arm. More patients in the Intervention arm reported discussing CRC screening during the visit (72% vs. 60%, p=0.03) and had higher intention to follow through with their preferred approach (58.0% vs. 47.1, p=0.03). Knowledge scores and visit satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms.<br />Conclusion: Physician training plus reminders were effective in increasing SDM and frequency of CRC testing discussions in an age group where SDM is essential.<br />Trial Registration: The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03959696).<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1525-1497
- Volume :
- 38
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of general internal medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 35931908
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07738-4