Back to Search Start Over

Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model.

Authors :
Powell E
Sahadzic I
Najafali D
Berman E
Andersen K
Afridi LZ
Gasparotti Z
Niles E
Rea J
Scalea T
Haase DJ
Tran QK
Source :
Critical care research and practice [Crit Care Res Pract] 2022 Jul 19; Vol. 2022, pp. 6171598. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 19 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The 6-bed critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) is a unique and specialized intensive care unit (ICU) that streamlines the interhospital transfer (IHT-transfer between different hospitals) process for a wide range of patients with critical illness or time-sensitive disease. Previous studies showed the unit successfully increased the number of ICU admissions while reducing the time of transfer in the first year of its establishment. However, its sustainability is unknown.<br />Methods: This was a descriptive retrospective analysis of adult, non-trauma patients who were transferred to an 800-bed quaternary medical center. Patients transferred to our medical center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were eligible. We used interrupted time series (ITS) and descriptive analyses to describe the trend and compare the transfer process between patients who were transferred to the CCRU versus those transferred to other adult inpatient units.<br />Results: From 2014 to 2018, 50,599 patients were transferred to our medical center; 31,582 (62%) were non-trauma adults. Compared with the year prior to the opening of the CCRU, ITS showed a significant increase in IHT after the establishment of the CCRU. The CCRU received a total of 7,788 (25%) IHTs during this period or approximately 20% of total transfers per year. Most transfers (41%) occurred via ground. Median and interquartile range [IQR] of transfer times to other ICUs (156 [65-1027] minutes) were longer than the CCRU (46 [22-139] minutes, P < 0.001). For the CCRU, the most common accepting services were cardiac surgery (16%), neurosurgery (11%), and emergency general surgery (10%).<br />Conclusions: The CCRU increases the overall number of transfers to our institution, improves patient access to specialty care while decreasing transfer time, and continues to be a sustainable model over time. Additional research is needed to determine if transferring patients to the CCRU would continue to improve patients' outcomes and hospital revenue.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Elizabeth Powell et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2090-1305
Volume :
2022
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care research and practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35912041
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6171598