Back to Search Start Over

A comparison of adverse pregnancy events between ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes in the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy: A propensity score-matched analysis of a large multi-institutional research network.

Authors :
Mason MM
Nackeeran S
Lokeshwar S
Carino Mason MR
Kohn T
Shah HN
Ramasamy R
Source :
World journal of urology [World J Urol] 2023 Jul; Vol. 41 (7), pp. 1721-1726. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 31.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate rates of adverse pregnancy events associated with the use of percutaneous nephrostomy tubes (PCN) versus ureteral stents in the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy.<br />Methods: We queried the TriNetX Diamond Network database to evaluate pregnant women (ICD-10 Z34, O09) with a history of nephrolithiasis (N20-23) who underwent a PCN (CPT 50432) or ureteral stent (52332) placement up to 6 months before delivery (O80-82). We controlled for the following potentially confounding variables through propensity score matching: age, race, ethnicity, acute pyelonephritis (N10), infections of the genitourinary tract in pregnancy (O23.0), and other sepsis (A41) at the time of stent or PCN placement.<br />Results: We identified 2,999 pregnant women who underwent ureteral stent placement and 321 who underwent PCN. Following propensity score matching, we found there to be no significant difference in the rate of premature labor or delivery (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.735-1.588), premature rupture of membranes (0.889, 0.453-1.743), intrauterine infection (0.906, 0.379-2.165), or c-Sect. (0.825, 0.408-1.667). Within 6 months of their initial procedure, women with a ureteral stent experienced a significantly decreased rate of subsequent urinary tract infection (UTI) or pyelonephritis (0.52, 0.38-0.71), inpatient hospital stay (0.40, 0.26-0.64), emergency department visit (0.65, 0.48-0.89), and repeat exchange procedure (0.70, 0.51-0.96).<br />Conclusion: In the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy, PCN versus ureteral stent placement does not confer a significant difference in rates of adverse pregnancy events. However, ureteral stent placement was associated with a lower incidence of hospital admissions, emergency department visits, exchange procedures, and new UTIs or pyelonephritis.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-8726
Volume :
41
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
World journal of urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35909212
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04111-2