Back to Search Start Over

In Vivo Evaluation of Permeable and Impermeable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors :
Sartoretto SC
Gens NF
de Brito Resende RF
Alves ATNN
Cecato RC
Uzeda MJ
Granjeiro JM
Calasans-Maia MD
Calasans-Maia JA
Source :
Membranes [Membranes (Basel)] 2022 Jul 15; Vol. 12 (7). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 15.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The degree of biodegradation and the inflammatory response of membranes employed for guided bone regeneration directly impact the outcome of this technique. This study aimed to evaluate four different experimental versions of Poly (L-lactate-co-Trimethylene Carbonate) (PTMC) + Poly (L-lactate-co-glycolate) (PLGA) membranes, implanted in mouse subcutaneous tissue, compared to a commercially available membrane and a Sham group.<br />Methods: Sixty Balb-C mice were randomly divided into six experimental groups and subdivided into 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks (n = 5 groups/period). The membranes (1 cm <superscript>2</superscript> ) were implanted in the subcutaneous back tissue of the animals. The samples were obtained for descriptive and semiquantitative histological evaluation (ISO 10993-6).<br />Results: G1 and G4 allowed tissue adhesion and the permeation of inflammatory cells over time and showed greater phagocytic activity and permeability. G2 and G3 detached from the tissue in one and three weeks; however, in the more extended periods, they presented a rectilinear and homogeneous aspect and were not absorbed. G2 had a major inflammatory reaction. G5 was almost completely absorbed after 12 weeks.<br />Conclusions: The membranes are considered biocompatible. G5 showed a higher degree of biosorption, followed by G1 and G4. G2 and G3 are considered non-absorbable in the studied periods.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2077-0375
Volume :
12
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Membranes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35877914
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12070711