Balances among reproduction, antioxidant responses and lipid metabolism underlying the multi-generational effects of N-butylpyridinium bromide on Caenorhabditis elegans.

Ionic liquids (ILs) are difficult to degrade and even accumulate in the environment. Accordingly, their long-term toxicities are particularly important to demonstrate their accurate risk assessment. However, their long-term toxicities over generations and the toxicity mechanisms lacked thorough investigation. Presently, N-butylpyridinium bromide ([bpyr]Br), a representative IL, was chosen to measure its long-term effects on Caenorhabditis elegans for seven consecutive generations at 0.0225 and 22.5 mg/L. Toxicity mechanisms were explored in F1, F3, F5 and F7 by combining both antioxidant responses and lipid metabolism. Results showed that [bpyr]Br at low concentration provoked oscillatory effects on the reproduction over 7 generations, with inhibition in F1 and F7 and stimulation in F2, F4 and F5. At high concentration, [bpyr]Br showed similar multi-generational oscillation with greater inhibition in F1 and greater stimulation in F5. The effects of [bpyr]Br on the antioxidant responses to oxidative stress also showed oscillation over generations. The integrated biomarker response (IBR) values showed that [bpyr]Br at low concentration did not provoke significant influences on the overall antioxidant homeostasis in F1 and F3, but significantly stimulated it in F5 and F7. Meanwhile, [bpyr]Br at high concentration stimulated the antioxidant homeostasis in F1 and F7 with non-significant influences in F3 and F5. The IBR values regarding indicators in lipid metabolism showed that [bpyr]Br significantly and commonly stimulated the overall metabolism without concentration-dependent differences. Further analysis implied that [bpyr]Br provoked different mechanisms underlying the responses at low and high concentrations.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)