Back to Search Start Over

Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part A: Main outcomes and conclusions.

Authors :
Havermans A
Mallock N
Zervas E
Caillé-Garnier S
Mansuy T
Michel C
Pennings JLA
Schulz T
Schwarze PE
Solimini R
Tassin JP
Vardavas CI
Merino M
Pauwels CGGM
van Nierop LE
Lambré C
Bolling AK
Source :
Tobacco prevention & cessation [Tob Prev Cessat] 2022 Jul 05; Vol. 8, pp. 27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 05 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The European Union Tobacco Products Directive (EU TPD) mandates enhanced reporting obligations for tobacco manufacturers regarding 15 priority additives. Within the Joint Action on Tobacco Control (JATC), a review panel of independent experts was appointed for the scientific evaluation of the additive reports submitted by a consortium of 12 tobacco manufacturers. As required by the TPD, the reports were evaluated based on their comprehensiveness, methodology and conclusions. In addition, we evaluated the chemical, toxicological, addictive, inhalation facilitating and flavoring properties of the priority additives based on the submitted reports, supplemented by the panel's expert knowledge and some independent literature. The industry concluded that none of the additives is associated with concern. Due to significant methodological limitations, we question the scientific validity of these conclusions and conclude that they are not warranted. Our review demonstrates that many issues regarding toxicity, addictiveness and attractiveness of the additives have not been sufficiently addressed, and therefore concerns remain. For example, menthol facilitates inhalation by activation of the cooling receptor TRPM8. The addition of sorbitol and guar gum leads to a significant increase of aldehydes that may contribute to toxicity and addictiveness. Titanium dioxide particles (aerodynamic diameter <10 µm) are legally classified as carcinogenic when inhaled. For diacetyl no report was provided. Overall, the industry reports were not comprehensive, and the information presented provides an insufficient basis for the regulation of most additives. We, therefore, advise MS to consider alternative approaches such as the precautionary principle.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.<br /> (© Havermans A. et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2459-3087
Volume :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Tobacco prevention & cessation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35860504
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/151529