Back to Search
Start Over
Public Insurance Payment Does Not Compensate Hospital Cost for Care of Long-Bone Fractures Requiring Additional Surgery to Promote Union.
- Source :
-
Journal of orthopaedic trauma [J Orthop Trauma] 2022 Aug 01; Vol. 36 (8), pp. e318-e325. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Objectives: To quantify the total hospital costs associated with the treatment of lower extremity long-bone fracture aseptic and septic unhealed fracture, to determine if insurance adequately covers these costs, and to examine whether insurance type correlates with barriers to accessing care.<br />Design: Retrospective cohort study.<br />Setting: Academic Level II trauma center.<br />Patients: All patients undergoing operative treatment of OTA/AO classification 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, and 43 fractures between 2012 and 2020 at a single Level II trauma center with minimum of 1-year follow-up.<br />Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the total cost of treatment for all hospital-based episodes of care. Distance traveled from primary residence was measured as a surrogate for barriers to care.<br />Results: One hundred seventeen patients with uncomplicated fracture healing, 82 with aseptic unhealed fracture, and 44 with septic unhealed fracture were included in the final cohort. The median cost of treatment for treatment of septic unhealed fracture was $148,318 [interquartile range(IQR) 87,241-256,928], $45,230 (IQR 31,510-68,030) for treatment of aseptic unhealed fracture, and $33,991 (IQR 25,609-54,590) for uncomplicated fracture healing. The hospital made a profit on all patients with commercial insurance, but lost money on all patients with public insurance. Among patients with unhealed fracture, those with public insurance traveled 4 times further for their care compared with patients with commercial insurance (P = 0.004).<br />Conclusions: Septic unhealed fracture of lower extremity long-bone fractures is an outsized burden on the health care system. Public insurance for both septic and aseptic unhealed fracture does not cover hospital costs. The increased distances traveled by our Medi-Cal and Medicare population may reflect the economic disincentive for local hospitals to care for publicly insured patients with unhealed fractures.<br />Level of Evidence: Economic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.<br />Competing Interests: Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, and patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1531-2291
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 35838557
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002350