Parental Support Policies and Benefits: A Surgical Training Program Report Card of Transparency.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the transparency of parental benefits available to US surgical residency applicants.
Background: Medical students prioritize work-family balance in specialty selection. Those applying to surgical residency programs also place a significant value on parental leave policies when deciding where to train. However, little is known about the amount of information that surgical training programs publicly offer to potential applicants regarding family support policies.
Methods: Publicly available websites for 264 general surgery training programs were accessed to determine the availability of information on parental benefits. Twenty-six "items of transparency" included types of leave, contract flexibility, salary, lactation, and childcare support. Programs with fewer than the median items of transparency were contacted to inquire about additional public resources. Academic programs were stratified by their associated medical school rankings in the US News & World Report.
Results: A total of 144 (54%) programs were academic and 214 (81.4%) had male program directors. The median number of items of transparency was 8 (29.6%). Of the 131 programs contacted, 33 (25.9%) replied, and 2 (6.1%) improved their transparency score. Academic programs associated with medical schools in the upper third of the rankings were more likely to have ≥8 items of transparency (70.8% vs. 45.6%; P =0.002). In the adjusted analysis, academic programs [odds ratio (OR): 3.44, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.87-6.34], those with female program directors (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.01-4.33), and those located in the Western (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.31-7.45) and Southern (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.21-4.98) regions of the country were more likely to have ≥8 items of transparency.
Conclusions: There are significant deficits in publicly available information related to parental benefits for many surgical training programs, which may impact applicants' decision making. Attracting the most talented candidates requires programs to create and share policies that support the integration of professional and personal success.
Competing Interests: P.M.S. reports grants from Burroughs Wellcome Fund Physician Scientist Award No 1018894/Vanderbilt (SCRIPS award recipient) and from the National Cancer Institute (F32 fellowship award recipient CA236309) outside the submitted work. K.P.T. is the principal investigator on the AMA Reimagining Residency Grant outside the submitted work. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)