Back to Search Start Over

Reliability and Safety of a Side-Branch Jailed Second-Generation Optical-Pressure Guidewire in a Physiology-Guided Bifurcation-PCI In Vitro Model.

Authors :
Rubimbura V
Johnson N
Van't Veer M
Adjedj J
Fournier S
Dupré M
De Bruyne B
Eeckhout E
Muller O
Source :
The Journal of invasive cardiology [J Invasive Cardiol] 2022 Aug; Vol. 34 (8), pp. E594-E600. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 07.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The treatment of a coronary bifurcation with a single stent (the provisional stenting technique) is associated with a good outcome in most cases. In the majority of cases, after provisional stenting technique, a residual significant angiographic stenosis is associated with the absence of ischemia when fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured. Jailing an optical pressure guidewire in the side branch (SB) could potentially reduce unnecessary SB interventions after provisional stenting technique. The aim of this study was to compare distal pressure to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) measurements between 2 second-generation optical pressure guidewires in bifurcation treatment-a jailed wire (JW) and a second free-floating wire (FW) advanced into the SB after stenting.<br />Methods: In an in vitro bifurcation hydrodynamic model with pressure sensors, a JW was advanced into the SB and the FW into the main branch. Bifurcation stenting is performed with the proximal optimization technique (POT)-side-POT technique using a 3.0 x 22-mm stent, a 4.0 x 12-mm noncompliant balloon for the POT, and a 2.5 x 12-mm semicompliant balloon for the SB opening. The same steps were performed in a second model where a surgical clamp was placed in the main vessel to lower overall absolute values pressures.<br />Results: A strong correlation was found between JW and FW values (Pearson's coefficient, r=0.91). All wires could be safely retrieved.<br />Conclusion: In bifurcation stenting, the Pd/Pa value of a second-generation optical pressure guidewire jailed in the SB is reliable compared with a FW inserted after stent implantation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-2501
Volume :
34
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of invasive cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35830360