Back to Search Start Over

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

Authors :
Aggarwal AN
Agarwal R
Dhooria S
Prasad KT
Sehgal IS
Muthu V
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2022 Jul 11; Vol. 17 (7), pp. e0268483. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 11 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) assays for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), through systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.<br />Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases for publications reporting diagnostic accuracy of Xpert or Ultra for TPE. We used bivariate random-effects modeling to summarize diagnostic accuracy information from individual studies using either mycobacterial culture or composite criteria as reference standard. We performed meta-regression through hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) modeling to evaluate comparative performance of the two tests from studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of both in the same study population.<br />Results: We retrieved 1097 publications, and included 74 for review. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for Xpert were 0.52 (95% CI 0.43-0.60, I2 82.1%) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99, I2 85.1%), respectively, using culture-based reference standard; and 0.21 (95% CI 0.17-0.26, I2 81.5%) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00, I2 37.6%), respectively, using composite reference standard. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for Ultra were 0.68 (95% CI 0.55-0.79, I2 80.0%) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.97-0.99, I2 92.1%), respectively, using culture-based reference standard; and 0.47 (95% CI 0.40-0.55, I2 64.1%) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99, I2 54.8%), respectively, using composite reference standard. HSROC meta-regression yielded relative diagnostic odds ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 0.65-2.50) and 1.80 (95% CI 0.41-7.84) respectively in favor of Ultra, using culture and composite criteria as reference standard.<br />Conclusion: Ultra provides superior diagnostic accuracy over Xpert for diagnosing TPE, mainly because of its higher sensitivity.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
17
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35816471
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268483