Back to Search Start Over

Immunogenic dynamics and SARS-CoV-2 variant neutralisation of the heterologous ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccination: Secondary analysis of the randomised CombiVacS study.

Authors :
García-Pérez J
González-Pérez M
Castillo de la Osa M
Borobia AM
Castaño L
Bertrán MJ
Campins M
Portolés A
Lora D
Bermejo M
Conde P
Hernández-Gutierrez L
Carcas A
Arana-Arri E
Tortajada M
Fuentes I
Ascaso A
García-Morales MT
Erick de la Torre-Tarazona H
Arribas JR
Imaz-Ayo N
Mellado-Pau E
Agustí A
Pérez-Ingidua C
Gómez de la Cámara A
Ochando J
Belda-Iniesta C
Frías J
Alcamí J
Pérez-Olmeda M
Source :
EClinicalMedicine [EClinicalMedicine] 2022 Jul 01; Vol. 50, pp. 101529. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 01 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The CombiVacS study was designed to assess immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the heterologous ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 combination, and 14-day results showed a strong immune response. The present secondary analysis addresses the evolution of humoral and cellular response up to day 180.<br />Methods: Between April 24 and 30, 2021, 676 adults primed with ChAdOx1-S were enrolled in five hospitals in Spain, and randomised to receive BNT162b2 as second dose (interventional group [IG]) or no vaccine (control group [CG]). Individuals from CG received BNT162b2 as second dose and also on day 28, as planned based on favourable results on day 14. Humoral immunogenicity, measured by immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD), antibody functionality using pseudovirus neutralisation assays for the reference (G614), Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, as well as cellular immune response using interferon-γ and IL-2 immunoassays were assessed at day 28 after BNT162b2 in both groups, at day 90 (planned only in the interventional group) and at day 180 (laboratory data cut-off on Nov 19, 2021). This study was registered with EudraCT (2021-001978-37) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04860739).<br />Findings: In this secondary analysis, 664 individuals (441 from IG and 223 from CG) were included. At day 28 post vaccine, geometric mean titres (GMT) of RBD antibodies were 5616·91 BAU/mL (95% CI 5296·49-5956·71) in the IG and 7298·22 BAU/mL (6739·41-7903·37) in the CG ( p  < 0·0001). RBD antibodies titres decreased at day 180 (1142·0 BAU/mL [1048·69-1243·62] and 1836·4 BAU/mL [1621·62-2079·62] in the IG and CG, respectively; p  < 0·0001). Neutralising antibodies also waned from day 28 to day 180 in both the IG (1429·01 [1220·37-1673·33] and 198·72 [161·54-244·47], respectively) and the CG (1503·28 [1210·71-1866·54] and 295·57 [209·84-416·33], respectively). The lowest variant-specific response was observed against Omicron-and Beta variants, with low proportion of individuals exhibiting specific neutralising antibody titres (NT50) >1:100 at day 180 (19% and 22%, respectively).<br />Interpretation: Titres of RBD antibodies decay over time, similar to homologous regimes. Our findings suggested that delaying administration of the second dose did not have a detrimental effect after vaccination and may have improved the response obtained. Lower neutralisation was observed against Omicron and Beta variants at day 180.<br />Funding: Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII).<br />Competing Interests: JA has received fees for educational programs from Gilead, MSD, GSK and Janssen outside of the submitted work. MC has participated in advisory boards and has received research funding from GSK, Sanofy Pasteur, Pfizer, Novavax and Janssen.CB-I is the deputy general manager of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. JRA has received fees from Janssen, outside of the submitted work. AMB is principal investigator of clinical trials sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, and Farmalider, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.<br /> (© 2022 The Authors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2589-5370
Volume :
50
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
EClinicalMedicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35795713
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101529