Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus in Tenofovir-Treated and Untreated Chronically Infected Mothers and Their Immunoprophylaxis Failure Infants.

Background: Maternal tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy during late pregnancy can reduce mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV). We investigated HBV mutations associated with maternal TDF therapy and their role in infant immunonophylaxis failure (IPF).
Methods: Serum samples from untreated (n = 89) and TDF-treated (n = 68), highly viremic, chronically infected mothers and their infants were analyzed for HBV DNA by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencing.
Results: At delivery, compared with untreated mothers, TDF-treated mothers had a lower HBV DNA titer and a higher frequency of basal core promoter (BCP) gene mutations, but they had similar frequencies in pre-S/S and pre-core/core mutations. The 14 mothers harboring surface "a" determinant mutants did not transmit the mutants to their immunized infants. Such mutants were found in 3 of 13 IPF infants; the 13 mothers had wild-type hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). In univariable analysis, maternal HBV DNA titer (odds ratio [OR]: 1.54; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.02-2.33; P = .039), genotype C (OR: 4.18; 95% CI: 1.28-13.62; P = .018) and pre-S1 wild-type sequence (OR: 6.33; 95% CI: 1.85-21.68; P = .003) at delivery were associated with infant IPF. Multivariable analyses showed that maternal genotype C (OR: 3.71; 95% CI: 1.11-12.36; P = .033) and pre-S1 wild-type (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.79-22.44; P = .004) were associated with infant IPF independently of maternal viremia.
Conclusions: Along with high maternal HBV DNA titer at delivery, maternal genotype C and pre-S1 wild-type sequence were potential risk factors for infant IPF, although BCP mutations were not. The offspring of pregnant women harboring "a" determinant mutants as major strains seemed to be protected by immunoprophylaxis.
Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01312012.
Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors have no reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
(© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)