Cite
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
MLA
Hermans, Sem M. M., et al. “Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” International Journal of Spine Surgery, vol. 16, no. 3, June 2022, pp. 472–80. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.14444/8241.
APA
Hermans, S. M. M., Droeghaag, R., Schotanus, M. G. M., Santbrink, H. van, van Hemert, W. L. W., & Curfs, I. (2022). Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 16(3), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.14444/8241
Chicago
Hermans, Sem M M, Ruud Droeghaag, Martijn G M Schotanus, Henk van Santbrink, Wouter L W van Hemert, and Inez Curfs. 2022. “Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” International Journal of Spine Surgery 16 (3): 472–80. doi:10.14444/8241.