Efficiency, efficacy and subjective user satisfaction of alternative laboratory report formats. An investigation on behalf of the Working Group for Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).

MLA

Cadamuro, Janne, et al. “Efficiency, Efficacy and Subjective User Satisfaction of Alternative Laboratory Report Formats. An Investigation on Behalf of the Working Group for Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 60, no. 9, June 2022, pp. 1356–64. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0269.

APA

Cadamuro, J., Winzer, J., Perkhofer, L., von Meyer, A., Bauça, J. M., Plekhanova, O., Linko-Parvinen, A., Watine, J., Kniewallner, K. M., Keppel, M. H., Šálek, T., Mrazek, C., Felder, T. K., Oberkofler, H., Haschke-Becher, E., Vermeersch, P., Kristoffersen, A. H., & Eisl, C. (2022). Efficiency, efficacy and subjective user satisfaction of alternative laboratory report formats. An investigation on behalf of the Working Group for Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 60(9), 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0269

Chicago

Cadamuro, Janne, Johannes Winzer, Lisa Perkhofer, Alexander von Meyer, Josep M Bauça, Olga Plekhanova, Anna Linko-Parvinen, et al. 2022. “Efficiency, Efficacy and Subjective User Satisfaction of Alternative Laboratory Report Formats. An Investigation on Behalf of the Working Group for Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM).” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 60 (9): 1356–64. doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-0269.