Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy evaluation of different measurement methods for target lesions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy in locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors :
Hou FJ
Zhao D
Yan XY
Li XT
Sun Y
Sun YS
Gao SY
Source :
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology [Asia Pac J Clin Oncol] 2023 Feb; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 187-195. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 12.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Aim: To assess the diagnostic efficacy in response evaluation of hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) using different CT measurement methods.<br />Methods and Materials: One hundred and three patients with locally advanced HPC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and radical radiotherapy (RT) were retrospectively enrolled. The long diameter, short diameter and largest axial area of the tumors and the largest metastatic cervical lymph node (LN) were measured before and after NACT, at the end of RT and 1 month after RT. Tumor regression ratios of the sum of the tumor's long diameter and LN's short diameter (LDTSDL), the sum of tumor and LN's short diameter (TTSDL), the sum of tumor and LN's largest axial area (AATML) were calculated. Analysis was conducted for overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS).<br />Results: Note that 35, 28, 23, and 16 patients suffered death, local recurrence, regional recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. TTSDL-defined effective group demonstrated better LRFS (p = .039) and RRFS (p = .047) after NACT and better OS since the end of RT (p = .037); AATML-defined effective groups demonstrated better OS, LRFS, and RRFS since the end of RT (p = .015, .008, and .005). While LDTSDL-defined groups showed differences in OS and LRFS until 1 month after RT (p = .013 and .014).<br />Conclusions: The regression rate of TTSDL and AATML can distinguish prognosis at an earlier time and demonstrated better reliability compared with LDTSDL. They were recommended for response evaluation in HPC.<br /> (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1743-7563
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35692104
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13796