A Novel Prescription Method Reduces Postoperative Opioid Distribution and Consumption: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Prescription opioid abuse in the United States has risen substantially over the past 2 decades. Narcotic prescription refill restrictions may paradoxically be contributing to this epidemic. We investigated a novel, refill-based opioid prescription method to determine whether it would alter postoperative narcotic distribution or consumption.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing internal fixation of distal radius fractures or thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty received either a single prescription for all postoperative narcotics (control arm) or the same amount of pain medication divided into 3 equal prescriptions to be filled as needed (experimental arm). Outcomes included total narcotics dispensed, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) through a prescription monitoring program, patient-reported opioid consumption versus opioid not consumed, and a satisfaction survey.
Results: Forty-eight participants were enrolled; 25 were randomized to the control arm and 23 to the experimental arm. At 8 weeks post-op, fewer opioids had been dispensed to the experimental arm (177 ± 94 vs 287 ± 123 MME, P = .0025). At 6-week follow-up, the experimental arm reported lower narcotic consumption (124 ± 105 vs 214 ± 110 MME, P = .0131). Subanalysis of the independent surgeries yielded similar results. Some patients reported insurance issues when filling subsequent prescriptions. Consequently, although 100% of control arm patients reported good pain control, only 82.6% of experimental arm patients said likewise ( P = .0455).
Conclusions: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients obtained and consumed fewer narcotics when postoperative opioids were given in a refill-based prescription method. More research is needed to determine whether this opioid distribution method is reproducible, translatable, and feasible.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.