Back to Search
Start Over
Applying 3D-Printed Templates in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer: Simplified Needle Insertion for Optimized Dosimetry.
- Source :
-
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2022 Sep 01; Vol. 114 (1), pp. 111-119. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 30. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Purpose: In cervical cancer brachytherapy, adding interstitial needles to intracavitary applicators can enhance dosimetry by improving target coverage while limiting normal tissue dose. However, its use is limited to a subset of practitioners with appropriate technical skill. We designed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial templates (TARGITs) with a 3-dimensional (3D) printing workflow to optimize needle placement and facilitate greater ease-of-use of intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) technique. This study compared dosimetry and procedure characteristics between tandem and ovoid (T&O) implants using TARGIT technique versus non-TARGIT technique.<br />Methods and Materials: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive radiation treatment for cervical cancer between February 2017 and January 2021. TARGIT technique was implemented from November 2019 onwards; all prior procedures involved non-TARGIT technique using a no needle or freehand needle approach. Target coverage, dose to organs at risk, and procedure times were evaluated and compared between TARGIT technique and non-TARGIT technique.<br />Results: The cohort included 70 patients with cervical cancer who underwent 302 T&O procedures: 68 (23%) with TARGIT technique and 234 (77%) with non-TARGIT technique, which included 133 no needle and 101 freehand needle implants. TARGIT implants involved longer average procedure times (+6.3 minutes, P < .0001). TARGIT implants achieved a higher mean high-risk clinical target volume V100% than non-TARGIT implants (+4.4%, P = .001), including for large tumors 30 cm <superscript>3</superscript> or greater (+8.1%, P = .002). Average D90 was 4.6 Gy higher and average D98 was 3.2 Gy higher for TARGIT technique compared with non-TARGIT technique (P = .006 and P = .02). Total treatment doses to rectum, bowel, and bladder were not significantly different for TARGIT versus non-TARGIT technique.<br />Conclusions: The 3D-printed TARGIT approach to T&O brachytherapy achieved greater tumor coverage while sparing normal tissues, particularly for large tumor volumes, with only a slight increase in average procedure time. TARGIT represents a creative technological solution for increasing accessibility of advanced IC/IS brachytherapy technique for cervical cancer definitive radiation treatment.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-355X
- Volume :
- 114
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 35654306
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.027