Back to Search Start Over

Outcome differences between surgeons performing first and subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a day: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors :
Zhang D
Gu D
Rao C
Zhang H
Su X
Chen S
Ma H
Zhao Y
Feng W
Sun H
Zheng Z
Source :
BMJ quality & safety [BMJ Qual Saf] 2023 Apr; Vol. 32 (4), pp. 192-201. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 01.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: With increasing surgical workload, it is common for cardiac surgeons to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after other procedures in a workday. To investigate whether prior procedures performed by the surgeon impact the outcomes, we compared the outcomes between CABGs performed first versus those performed after prior procedures, separately for on-pump and off-pump CABGs as they differed in technical complexity.<br />Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG in China from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients were categorised as undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABGs. Outcomes of the procedures performed first in primary surgeons' daily schedule (first procedure) were compared with subsequent ones (non-first procedure). The primary outcome was an adverse events composite (AEC) defined as the number of adverse events, including in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, presented as binary variables. Mixed-effects models were used, adjusting for patient and surgeon-level characteristics and year of surgery.<br />Results: Among 21 866 patients, 10 109 (16.1% as non-first) underwent on-pump and 11 757 (29.6% as non-first) off-pump CABG. In the on-pump cohort, there was no significant association between procedure order and the outcomes (all p>0.05). In the off-pump cohort, non-first procedures were associated with an increased number of AEC (adjusted rate ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.47, p<0.001), myocardial infarction (adjusted OR (OR <subscript>adj</subscript> ) 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.81, p=0.003) and stroke (OR <subscript>adj</subscript> 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.53, p=0.005) compared with first procedures. These increases were only found to be statistically significant when the procedure was performed by surgeons with <20 years' practice or surgeons with a preindex volume <700 cases.<br />Conclusions: For a technically challenging surgical procedure like off-pump CABG, prior workload adversely affected patient outcomes.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-5423
Volume :
32
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ quality & safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35649696
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014244