Back to Search Start Over

Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial.

Authors :
Smith TO
Parsons S
Ooms A
Dutton S
Fordham B
Garrett A
Hing C
Lamb S
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2022 May 31; Vol. 12 (5), pp. e061373. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 31.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).<br />Design: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial.<br />Setting: National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals.<br />Participants: 224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed 'moderately inactive' or 'inactive'.<br />Intervention: Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental).<br />Randomisation and Blinding: Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life.<br />Results: Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: -0.03 (95% CI -0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance.<br />Conclusions: There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution.<br />Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN29770908.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
12
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35641012
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373