Back to Search
Start Over
In vitro Evolution of Uracil Glycosylase Towards DnaKJ and GroEL Binding Evolves Different Misfolded States.
- Source :
-
Journal of molecular biology [J Mol Biol] 2022 Jul 15; Vol. 434 (13), pp. 167627. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 18. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Natural evolution is driven by random mutations that improve fitness. In vitro evolution mimics this process, however, on a short time-scale and is driven by the given bait. Here, we used directed in vitro evolution of a random mutant library of Uracil glycosylase (eUNG) displayed on yeast surface to select for binding to chaperones GroEL, DnaK + DnaJ + ATP (DnaKJ) or E. coli cell extract (CE), using binding to the eUNG inhibitor Ugi as probe for native fold. The CE selected population was further divided to Ugi binders (+U) or non-binders (-U). The aim here was to evaluate the sequence space and physical state of the evolved protein binding the different baits. We found that GroEL, DnaKJ and CE-U select and enrich for mutations causing eUNG to misfold, with the three being enriched in mutations in buried and conserved positions, with a tendency to increase positive charge. Still, each selection had its own trajectory, with GroEL and CE-U selecting mutants highly sensitive to protease cleavage while DnaKJ selected partially structured misfolded species with a tendency to refold, making them less sensitive to proteases. More general, our results show that GroEL has a higher tendency to purge promiscuous misfolded protein mutants from the system, while DnaKJ binds misfolding-prone mutant species that are, upon chaperone release, more likely to natively refold. CE-U shares some of the properties of GroEL- and DnaKJ-selected populations, while harboring also unique properties that can be explained by the presence of additional chaperones in CE, such as Trigger factor, HtpG and ClpB.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Author contributions Oran Melanker: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Software, Writing. Pierre Goloubinoff: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing. Gideon Schreiber: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing. Classification Protein evolution.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Bacterial Proteins metabolism
Chaperonin 60 genetics
Chaperonin 60 metabolism
Escherichia coli Proteins genetics
Molecular Chaperones metabolism
Peptide Hydrolases metabolism
Protein Binding
Protein Folding
Escherichia coli genetics
Escherichia coli metabolism
Escherichia coli Proteins metabolism
HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins metabolism
HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins metabolism
Heat-Shock Proteins metabolism
Uracil-DNA Glycosidase metabolism
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1089-8638
- Volume :
- 434
- Issue :
- 13
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of molecular biology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 35597550
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167627