Back to Search Start Over

A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors :
Santiago M
Cardoso-Teixeira P
Pereira S
Firmino-Machado J
Moreira S
Source :
International urogynecology journal [Int Urogynecol J] 2023 Mar; Vol. 34 (3), pp. 717-727. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 21.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid telerehabilitation program with a traditional face to face model in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed incontinence (MUI) with a predominance of SUI. The authors hypothesized that home pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) would have a similar benefit to outpatient PFMT.<br />Methods: Parallel randomized controlled trial including 58 patients consecutively admitted to a tertiary academic hospital for pelvic floor rehabilitation consultation from 1 January to 30 April 2021 for conservative treatment of UI. Participants randomized to the intervention were submitted to a 12-week PFMT program: (1) a hybrid telerehabilitation program of two individual face-to-face sessions followed by 2-weekly sessions of video-telerehabilitation with a follow-up by a specialized physiotherapist, including one individual face-to-face session at 8 weeks; (2) a re-evaluation teleconsultation at 6 and 16 weeks; (3) a face-to-face consultation at 12 weeks. The control group had two initial individual sessions followed by twice-weekly group classes, and consultations were face to face. The primary outcome measure (at baseline and 12 weeks) was UI-related quality of life using the Portuguese Version of the King's Health Questionnaire.<br />Results: At baseline the intervention (n = 18) and control (n = 17) groups were similar. UI-related quality of life significantly improved in both the intervention and control groups betweenbaseline (T0) and the end of the 12-week PFMT program (T12) (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively), although the magnitude of the improvement was not significantly different between groups (-10.0 vs. -9.5 points, p = 0.918, respectively).<br />Conclusion: This hybrid telerehabilitation protocol showed effectiveness comparable to the traditional model in improving UI-related quality of life. Trial registration at www.<br />Clinicaltrials: gov , no. NCT05114395.<br /> (© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-3023
Volume :
34
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International urogynecology journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35596802
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05108-6