Back to Search Start Over

Real-world experience with the new Watchman FLX device: Data from two high-volume Sicilian centers. The FLX-iEST registry.

Authors :
Vizzari G
Grasso C
Sardone A
Mazzone P
Laterra G
Frazzetto M
Sacchetta G
Micari A
Tamburino C
Contarini M
Source :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2022 Jul; Vol. 100 (1), pp. 154-160. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 20.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: The Watchman-FLX left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device presents innovative features: higher conformability, reduced length, closed distal "flex-ball" during deployment, and flattened surface. We report our real-world experience with the Watchman-FLX device in two centers with consolidated LAAC expertise.<br />Methods: We enrolled 200 consecutive Watchman-FLX patients (2019-2021) in a nonrandomized double-center registry; procedural data and follow-up for midterm clinical outcomes were collected. A control group of 100 patients treated with first-generation Watchman (2.5) was included.<br />Results: According to mean CHAD <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc (5 ± 1.40) and HAS-BLED (3.8 ± 1.01) scores, the population included in this study was at high risk: 29% had a previous stroke and 56.5% a bleeding event. Main LAAC indications were symptomatic hemorrhage (39.5%), need for triple antithrombotic therapy (39%), gastrointestinal bleeding (32%), and oral anticoagulation intolerance (18%). Transesophageal echocardiography guidance was followed in 93% of cases (48% in general anesthesia and 45% under conscious sedation). Repositioning an FLX device was required in 20% of cases and no complication occurred. In 96% of patients, the first selected device was delivered, while in 4% a device size change was required after the first choice (7% with Watchman 2.5). Peridevice leaks (<5 mm) were found postimplant in two cases (1%). Overall, the procedural success rate was 99.5%. One patient's procedure was unsuccessful (0.5%), due to left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy; differently, the mean failure rate with Watchman 2.5 was 2%. No device embolization was reported. Complications (8.5%) were mainly related to the access site (3%); major bleedings (1%), and in-hospital death (0.5%) rarely occurred. After a follow-up of 272 ± 173 days, 2.3% of cases experienced a non-device-related stroke and 0.6% fatal bleeding.<br />Conclusion: Our registry showed a high procedural success rate of the Watchman-FLX in a high-risk population. According to our experience, the main advantages include easy implanting and repositioning, absence of embolization, good LAA sealing, and low rate of complications in the follow-up period.<br /> (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-726X
Volume :
100
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35592941
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30237