Clinical Effect of Side-Approach Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Neuropathic Splenomegaly.

Objective: In order to investigate the clinical effect of side entry laparoscopic splenectomy in the treatment of splenomegaly caused by neurodegenerative diseases.
Methods: 62 patients who underwent endoscopic splenectomy in our hospital from July 2020 to June 2021 were randomly divided into two groups, including 3 cases in the observation group and 31 cases in the reference group. Clinical trials were conducted to compare different laparoscopic surgery methods, and follow-up investigation records were made; the drainage time and drainage volume, postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complications, and comprehensive effective rate of the two groups were observed and analyzed.
Results: Most of the drainage volume in the observation group was less than 800 ml, and most of the drainage volume in the reference group was more than 500 ml. Compared with the reference group, the average drainage time of patients in the observation group was lower, mostly within 6 days, while the drainage time of patients in the reference group was more than 8 days. The amount of bleeding in the observation group was mostly about 500 ml, with the largest number in the range of 300-500 ml, while the amount of bleeding in the reference group was mostly 800 ml and above, with the largest number in the range of 500-800 ml. The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the reference group. The effective, markedly effective and comprehensive effective rates of patients in the observation group were higher than those in the reference group, and the ineffective rate and deterioration rate were also lower.
Conclusion: The treatment of lateral laparoscopic splenectomy is very safe and effective and has obvious advantages, because it can reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications and provide a good basis for the recovery of patients. It is worthy to be widely used in clinical splenic surgery.
Competing Interests: There is no potential conflict of interest in our paper.
(Copyright © 2022 Zhao Yuan et al.)