Unstable plaques hide in heavily calcified coronary arteries.

Background: The napkin-ring sign (NRS) was accepted as unstable plaques at coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). However, the incidence is relatively low. We sought to assess whether the newly defined diamond-attenuation-sign [DAS, defined as a qualitative plaque feature in a mixed plaque (MP) on CCTA cross-section images by the presence of two features: a visual calcification (in the shape of a diamond) accompanied by an annular-shape lower attenuation plaque tissue surrounding the lumen like a ring], could be accurately identified as unstable atherosclerotic plaques.
Methods: Eight heart transplant recipients (8 male; mean age, 48.5±11.6 years; range, 37-65 years) underwent CCTA exams prior to heart transplant surgery. Segment-based CCTA sections were independently evaluated for various plaque patterns including non-calcified plaque (NCP) with NRS (NCP-NRS), NCP without NRS (NCP-non-NRS), MP with DAS (MP-DAS), MP without DAS sign (MP-non-DAS), and calcified plaque (CP).
Results: NCP-NRS plaques in 6.4% (23/358), NCP-non-NRS plaques in 24.0% (86/358), MP-DAS plaques in 18.2% (65/358), MP-non-DAS plaques in 20.1% (72/358), and calcified-plaques in 7.0% (25/358) of all cases. The specificity and positive predictive values of the MP-DAS and NCP-NRS signs to identify unstable plaque features were excellent (97.1% vs . 98.6%, 90.8% vs. 87.0%, respectively). DAS plaques were more frequently seen on CCTA exams than that of NRS (39.3% vs. 13.3%, respectively, P=0.001). The diagnostic performance of MP-DAS to identify unstable coronary lesions was superior compared to NCP-NRS [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), 0.756; 95% CI: 0.717-0.791 vs. 0.558; 95% CI: 0.514-0.600, respectively, P<0.001].
Conclusions: Both the DAS and NRS had a high specificity and positive predictive value for the presence of unstable lesions. DAS was a better identification of unstable atherosclerotic plaques in the assessment of plaque-calcification-pattern (PCP).
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-21-521/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
(2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.)