Evaluation of a personalized, dose-sparing revaccination strategy in hepatitis B vaccine non-responders.

Objectives: The detection of low levels of antibodies against HBsAg (anti-HBs) below 10 IU/L in non-responders after a primary hepatitis B vaccination, is associated with seroconversion after revaccination. We compared the diagnostic performance of four anti-HBs assays in non-responders in their ability to differentiate between absence or presence of low levels of anti-HBs and propose a revaccination strategy guided by anti-HBs titres.
Methods: Non-responders were revaccinated with Fendrix 20 μg at 0, 1 and 2 months. Anti-HBs titres were determined by Abbott Architect, Diasorin Liaison, Roche Cobas and Siemens ADVIA Centaur. Inter-assay agreement was evaluated with Cohen's Kappa (k) in baseline samples between zero-responders without detectable antibodies and poor-responders with detectable antibodies < 10 IU/L. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titres were analysed at 0, 1 and 3 months. A titre-based strategy (one revaccination dose and anti-HBs measurement followed by two more revaccination doses if required) was compared with the standard revaccination series of 3 doses.
Results: 57 participants were included in the analysis. k was ≥ 0.65 for all assays except ADVIA (k ≤ 0.41). After one revaccination dose all assays detected a mean seroconversion rate in zero-responders of 42.9%, compared to 85.1% in poor-responders. The difference between zero- and poor-responders in seroconversion rate per assay was significant (p < 0.05). After three revaccination doses the mean seroconversion rate was 88.2% in zero-responders and 98.5% in poor-responders (p > 0.286 per assay). A titre-based strategy reduced the amount of revaccinations by 17% compared with the standard.
Conclusions: All assays demonstrated a comparable difference in seroconversion rate between zero- and poor-responders after one revaccination dose. The revaccination strategy could be optimised by differentiation between zero- and poor-responders followed by a titre-guided schedule.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: GlaxoSmithKline and Merck Sharp & Dohme provided the vaccines used in the trial from which we obtained the participant data and serum samples for this study. Neither manufacturer was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the results, or writing of the report.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)