Is contralateral autogenous patellar tendon graft a better choice than ipsilateral for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young sportsmen? A randomized controlled trial.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the peak extensor torque (primary outcome), sensory-motor capacity and Lysholm questionnaire score up to the fourth postoperative month post-primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) graft using either ipsilateral or contralateral technique in young sportsmen.
Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial from 2018 to 2019. The same preoperative protocol, surgical technique and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. Eighty-eight young adult male patients were randomized, and 44 of each group completed the trial.
Results: After the follow up analysis, the contralateral receptor and donor limb demonstrated a statistically significant increase in peak extension torque compared with the ipsilateral operated limb (effect size (ES) = 0.99, power = 0.99, P < 0.0001; ES = 0.46, power = 0.56, P < 0.04). The symmetry between limbs was compared between groups. In the contralateral group, there was a significant decrease in the recipient limb (after surgery), compared with the donor limb (before surgery) (ES = 0.87, power = 0.99, P < 0.0001). In the ipsilateral group, the operated limb demonstrated a significant decrease in peak extension torque compared with the non-operated limb after surgery (ES = 1.88, power = 0.99, P < 0.0001). The comparison between groups in sensory-motor capacity and Lysholm score demonstrated a non-significant group effect postoperatively.
Conclusion: The use of contralateral BPTB is more effective in increasing peak extension torque when compared with ipsilateral technique in young sportsmen. Furthermore, patients achieved greater symmetry (side to side) in quadriceps muscle performance after the 4-month follow up with a contralateral graft.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)