Effects and Mechanisms of Peritoneal Resuscitation on Acute Kidney Injury After Severe Burns in Rats.

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in severe burn patients with poor prognosis and high mortality. Reduced kidney perfusion induced by the decreased effective circulating blood volume after severe burn is a common cause of AKI. Routine intravenous resuscitation (IR) is difficult or delayed in extreme conditions such as war and disaster sites. Peritoneal resuscitation (PR) is a simple, rapid resuscitation strategy via a puncture in the abdominal wall. This study investigated whether PR is a validated resuscitation strategy for AKI after severe burns in rats and explored its mechanisms.
Materials and Methods: Eighty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups: (1) sham group; (2) IR group, which was characterized by the full thickness burn of 50% of the total body surface area received IR immediately post-injury; (3) early PR group, in which rats with the same burn model received PR immediately post-injury; and (4) delayed resuscitation (DR) group, in which rats with the same burn model received no resuscitation within 3-hour post-injury. PR and DR groups animals received IR after 3-hour post-injury. The survival rate, mean arterial pressure, renal histopathology, renal function, indicators of renal injury, and renal hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4) proteins of rats were measured at 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-injury.
Results: Compared with rats in the DR group, rats in the PR group had a significantly improved survival rate (100% vs. 58.3% at 24 h, P = 0.0087), an increased mean arterial pressure (92.6 ± 6.6 vs. 65.3 ± 10.7, 85.1 ± 5.7 vs. 61.1 ± 6.9, 90.1 ± 8.7 vs. 74.9 ± 7.4 mmHg, at 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h, P < 0.01), a reduced renal water content rate (51.6% ± 5.0% vs. 70.1% ± 6.8%, 57.6% ± 7.7% vs. 69.5% ± 8.7%, at 12 h and 24 h, P < 0.01), attenuated histopathological damage, reduced serum creatinine expression (36.36 ± 4.27 vs. 49.98 ± 2.42, 52.29 ± 4.31 vs. 71.32 ± 5.2, 45.25 ± 2.55 vs. 81.15 ± 6.44 μmol/L, at 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h, P < 0.01) and BUN expression (7.62 ± 0.30 vs. 10.80 ± 0.58, 8.61 ± 0.32 vs. 28.58 ± 1.99, 8.09 ± 0.99 vs. 20.95 ± 1.02 mmol/L, at 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h, P < 0.01), increased kidney injury markers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin expression (95.09 ± 7.02 vs. 101.75 ± 6.23, 146.77 ± 11.54 vs. 190.03 ± 9.87, 112.79 ± 15.8 vs. 194.43 ± 11.47 ng/mL, at 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h, P < 0.01) and cystatin C expression (0.185 ± 0.006 vs. 0.197 ± 0.006, 0.345 ± 0.036 vs. 0.382 ± 0.013, 0.297 ± 0.012 vs. 0.371 ± 0.028 ng/mL, at 3 h, 12 h, and 24 h, P < 0.01), and reduced renal hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and NADPH oxidase 4 protein expression (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between rats in the PR group and the IR group in the above indicators.
Conclusions: Early PR could protect severe burn injury rats from AKI. It may be an alternative resuscitation strategy in severe burn injury when IR cannot be achieved.
(© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)