Back to Search Start Over

External Genital Revisions after Gender-Affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: Surgical Assessment, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors :
Dy GW
Salibian AA
Blasdel G
Zhao LC
Bluebond-Langner R
Source :
Plastic and reconstructive surgery [Plast Reconstr Surg] 2022 Jun 01; Vol. 149 (6), pp. 1429-1438. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 15.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Following gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty or vulvoplasty, patients may seek vulvar revision procedures for a variety of common aesthetic and functional concerns. These indications for revision and accompanying techniques are not well-described in the literature.<br />Methods: Patients who underwent vulvar revision surgery at the authors' institution were identified, and patient demographics, surgical indications, operative details, and complications were described. Common complaints requiring external genital revision were sorted into four categories: clitoral, labial, introital, and urethral.<br />Results: Thirty-five patients with a history of vaginoplasty underwent vulvar revision between May of 2017 and December of 2019. The mean age at surgical correction was 38.9 years. Ten patients (28.6 percent) had undergone prior secondary procedures (range, 1 to 3). Mean follow-up after revision surgery was 10.7 ± 8.7 months (range, 0 to 30.6 months). The majority of patients underwent concurrent revisions in multiple "categories". Labial aesthetic concerns were most common (n = 27, 77.1 percent), followed by clitoral (n = 20, 57.1 percent), urologic (n = 17, 48.6 percent), and introital complaints (n = 12, 34.3 percent). Twelve patients (34.3 percent) had canal stenosis requiring concurrent robot-assisted canal revision with peritoneal flaps. Complications included labial abscess (n = 1) and deep vein thrombosis (n = 1). Three patients (8.6 percent) underwent subsequent external genital revisions. Management approaches and surgical techniques for each of these common revision categories are provided.<br />Conclusion: As more individuals seek vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty, surgeons must be prepared to address a range of common aesthetic and functional complaints requiring vulvar revision.<br />Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1529-4242
Volume :
149
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35426889
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009165