Back to Search Start Over

Warfarin is associated with higher rates of epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants: A nationwide propensity score-weighted study.

Authors :
Ingason AB
Rumba E
Hreinsson JP
Agustsson AS
Lund SH
Palsson DA
Reynisson IE
Gudmundsdottir BR
Onundarson PT
Tryggvason G
Bjornsson ES
Source :
Journal of internal medicine [J Intern Med] 2022 Sep; Vol. 292 (3), pp. 501-511. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 29.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Although epistaxis is one of the most common side effects of oral anticoagulation, it is unclear whether epistaxis rates vary between different oral anticoagulants (OAC).<br />Objective: To compare rates of clinically relevant epistaxis between OAC.<br />Methods: Epistaxis event rates were compared between new users of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in a nationwide population-based cohort study over a 5-year study period, 2014-2019. Data was collected from the Icelandic Medicine Registry and the five major hospitals in Iceland. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to yield balanced baseline characteristics, and epistaxis rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression.<br />Results: During the study period, 2098 patients received apixaban, 474 dabigatran, 3106 rivaroxaban, and 1403 warfarin. In total, 93 patients presented with clinically relevant epistaxis, including 11 (12%) major epistaxis events and one fatal epistaxis episode. Furthermore, seven patients (9%) with non-major epistaxis later presented with major bleeding during the follow-up period. Warfarin use was associated with higher rates of epistaxis compared to apixaban (2.2 events per 100-person years (events/100-py) vs. 0.6 events/100-py, hazard ratio [HR] 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-8.59, p < 0.001), rivaroxaban (2.2 events/100-py vs. 1.0 events/100-py, HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.01, p = 0.005), and dabigatran (2.2 events/100-py vs. no events, HR n/a, p < 0.001).<br />Conclusion: Warfarin treatment was associated with higher rates of clinically relevant epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants.<br /> (© 2022 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2796
Volume :
292
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35411982
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13498