Back to Search Start Over

Pulse transit time-estimated blood pressure: a comparison of beat-to-beat and intermittent measurement.

Authors :
Hoshide S
Yoshihisa A
Tsuchida F
Mizuno H
Teragawa H
Kasai T
Koito H
Ando SI
Watanabe Y
Takeishi Y
Kario K
Source :
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension [Hypertens Res] 2022 Jun; Vol. 45 (6), pp. 1001-1007.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Pulse transit time (PTT), which refers to the travel time between two arterial sites within the same cardiac cycle, has been developed as a novel cuffless form of continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in BP parameters, including BP variability, between those assessed by beat-to-beat PTT-estimated BP (eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> ) and those assessed by intermittent PTT-estimated BP at fixed time intervals (eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> ) in patients suspected of having sleep disordered breathing (SDB). In 330 patients with SDB (average age, 66.8 ± 11.9 years; 3% oxygen desaturation index [ODI], 21.0 ± 15.0/h) from 8 institutes, PTT-estimated BP was continuously recorded during the nighttime. The average systolic eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> , maximum systolic and diastolic eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> , standard deviation (SD) of systolic and diastolic eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> , and coefficient variation (CV) of systolic and diastolic eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> were higher than the respective values of eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> (all P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> and eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> in average systolic BP and SD and CV of systolic BP, while there were disagreements in both minimum and maximum values of eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> and eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> in patients with high systolic BP (P < 0.05). Although systolic BP variability incrementally increased according to the tertiles of 3%ODI in both eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> and eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> (all P < 0.05), there was no difference in this tendency between eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> and eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> . In patients with suspected SDB, the difference between eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> and eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> was minimal, and there were disagreements regarding both the minimum and maximum BP. However, there were agreements in regard to the index of BP variability between eBP <subscript>BTB</subscript> and eBP <subscript>INT</subscript> .<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1348-4214
Volume :
45
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35388176
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-00899-z